馃嚜馃嚭鈿狅笍 A perfidious trick? The EU Council Presidency wants to introduce mandatory #ChatControl through the backdoor 馃毆: An Art. 4 amendment would MANDATE "all reasonable mitigation measures," including scanning, enforced with sanctions! 馃槨
https://cdn.netzpolitik.org/wp-upload/2025/11/2025-10-30_Council_Presidency_CSAR_Policy-debate_14032.pdf
Post
@echo_pbreyer I think it has nothing to do with CSAM, they will total control on us.
Straight to jail
@echo_pbreyer
@echo_pbreyer I hope I get to see the day when the Council is sacked in favor of a new democratic upper house for the EU parliament.
Essentially they are trying to get Parliament to agree to all the infrastructure of Chat Control - the EU Centre, data exchange channels, reporting systems - without the explicit scanning obligation, but with the ability to reintroduce it later with minimal legislative friction.
This creates a legal and technical foundation for future mass scanning, without having to fight the political battle now.
@echo_pbreyer
馃嚜馃嚘鈿狅笍 驴Juego sucio? La presidencia del consejo de la UE quiere introducir #ChatControl de marera obligada a trav茅s de una puerta trasera馃毆: Art. 4 ORDENA "todas las medidas de mitigaci贸n razonables ," incluyendo escaneo de comunicaciones, amenazando con sanciones! 馃槨
https://cdn.netzpolitik.org/wp-upload/2025/11/2025-10-30_Council_Presidency_CSAR_Policy-debate_14032.pdf
I demand live chat control of all members of the Commission, Council, MEPs, DG personnel, tech company boards and execs.
So the presidency wants to decide what everyone else had a problem with, scratch out some of those things from the proposal and push through all the rest? How does this make sense in any form?
Now we comparing rights, folks. And they are indirectly blaming us. Remember when they told that we were bought by Big Tech corporations? Those big freedom freaks!
Taken from https://netzpolitik.org/2025/drahtbericht-deutsche-diplomaten-fordern-undiplomatisch-chatkontrolle/
Maybe someone has been sleeping?
![[AF]2050](https://cdn.masto.host/livellosegretoit/accounts/avatars/108/038/613/412/755/896/original/a8e862dbd10edfd0.png "[AF]2050")
@echo_pbreyer Gosh, they really want to pass this crap so badly... ._.
@echo_pbreyer oh, if they're going to do that they should change the name to Eurussia because that's so stupid that I think only communistic states would do it.
@echo_pbreyer @Tutanota Seems like the fight will never end.
@echo_pbreyer Of course they do.
@echo_pbreyer What do we do now?
@echo_pbreyer This is bad news and hints at worse to come.
@echo_pbreyer perhaps its time to start shaming individuals? Who keeps coming up with that crap?
@nihilistic_capybara @echo_pbreyer Please feel free to shame this dipshit as much as you want https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Hummelgaard
They're enemies of democracy and the rights that come with it, simple as that.
@echo_pbreyer
Was waiting for trickery tbh 鈽癸笍
馃嚝馃嚪鈿狅笍 Perfide man艙uvre ? La pr茅sidence du Conseil de l'UE veut imposer le #ChatControl par la petite porte 馃毆 : une modification de l'art. 4 pour EXIGER 芦 toutes les mesures d'att茅nuation raisonnable 禄, y compris le scan ! 馃槨
https://cdn.netzpolitik.org/wp-upload/2025/11/2025-10-30_Council_Presidency_CSAR_Policy-debate_14032.pdf
馃嚠馃嚬鈿狅笍 Perfido inganno? La presidenza del Consiglio UE vuole imporre il #ChatControl dalla porta di servizio 馃毆: una modifica all'art. 4 per PRESCRIVERE 芦tutte le misure di attenuazione ragionevoli禄, inclusa la scansione, pena sanzioni! 馃槨
https://cdn.netzpolitik.org/wp-upload/2025/11/2025-10-30_Council_Presidency_CSAR_Policy-debate_14032.pdf
@echo_pbreyer Guess we got tricked so bad
@echo_pbreyer I thought it was too good to be true when Denmark ostensibly gave up.
Could you please provide some background? Where do we need to apply pressure?
